BYOD: What is It Good For?

BYOD: What is It Good For?

By Dave Michels January 3, 2013 5 Comments
Dave Michels JPG
BYOD: What is It Good For? by Dave Michels

BYOD is a term that entered the telecom vernacular in 2012. Unlike SIP or DTMF, it’s an acronym that we generally understand at least in terms of abbreviation. It stands for Bring Your Own Device, yet what it means is anyone’s guess. Opinions on meaning and if it is even a good thing, vary widely.

What does BYOD mean? At the simplest level, it means employees equip themselves with a mobile smart device rather than the more traditional role of the employer providing one. First off, I don’t think there was a clear traditional model. Secondly, BYOD is even less clear.

For example, does BYOD mean that employees can bring ANY mobile device, or are they limited to a menu of approved devices? If it’s a menu, does it include all major operating systems or just some? Can employees select any carrier or are they limited to a shortlist of approved service providers? If the phone comes with a term obligation, who pays the termination fee if it becomes necessary? Who owns the phone number? Does the employer have the right to load management/security software on the device? If a portion of the monthly service charge is to be reimbursed, who determines acceptable rates?

Unfortunately, none of those questions are addressed by the term BYOD. The point is that BYOD isn’t a solution, but rather a starting point. Each and every implementation requires the employer to create a policy that addresses all of these and additional questions. The problem is many believe it is a destination.

A policy of BYOD is meaningless. At worst, it means staff are on their own to interpret its meaning, and at best it means employers are paying more for mobile services (via reimbursement expenses) with reduced purchasing power.

Then comes the issues of usage and data. Are employees allowed to make business calls from their native BYOD device, or are they obligated to use a UC client? Is a UC client required or optional in a BYOD environment? UC enables employers to shield employees behind a corporate number, but is that lost with BYOD? Is information like call logs or contacts corporate information or personal information? Does the employee have an obligation to secure corporate information (password type), and does the employer have a right to view logs or access the device? If the device gets lost, does the employer have the right to remotely delete content? Does the employer have the right to search or seize this personal device that it is paying for?

BYOD is a Pandora’s box of issues. Many organizations already had policies that allowed employees to use their own devices, but smartphones changed the game. Too many corporations were solving these issues with corporate-owned devices from RIM, but the world experienced iPhone and Android frenzy. The natives revolted with BYOD. Meet the new boss, same as the old boss.

BYOD in its current form will not last. It is too chaotic and the liabilities are too great. The concept of employees funding their own devices is here to stay. What will change are the attitudes about how those devices can be used and controlled. I suspect the next big wave will be around virtualized mobile clients that keep data off the local devices.

 

5 Responses to "BYOD: What is It Good For?" - Add Yours

Gravatar
Art Rosenberg 1/3/2013 5:15:33 PM

Dave,

"BYOD" actually followed in the footsteps of "BYOC" (Bring Your Own Computer), when employees brought in their own laptops to work, but until Apple introduced the first multi-modal mobile device, the iPhone, just managing cell phone calls for mobile workers was of limited interest.

What's really now changing the game is "Consumer BYOD," which will require contact centers to accommodate customers (and agent support) with UC-enabled online "mobile apps" for smartphones, tablets, and desktops. This is where most IT organizations don't have the staff, expertise, or budget to properly plan and implement customized mobile business applications (inbound and outbound), and will require the expertise of third-party consultants and solution integrators for "cloud" based environments.

But you are right! "BYOD" is not a solution but a set of new business communication challenges that old telephony CPE technology can't solve!
Gravatar
Michael Finneran 1/4/2013 7:21:37 AM

Dave,

If organizations were to approach BYOD in the way you suggest, it would indeed be a fiasco and a case of gross irresponsibility, but most don't (at least not my clients). Rather than "throwing open the doors", we actually spend a lot of time discussing the risks, options, and concerns with both the IT department and business managers. The questions you raise are all valid, and part of a much longer list that I go through with clients.

The basic position we recommend is "Accessing corporate email and other systems is a 'privilege' and it comes with certain responsibilities this is what they are, and this is what will happen if you fail to comply". First off, we do limit the range of devices and specify approved models, operating systems, and releases. Generally the policy requires installing a mobile device management (MDM) client on the device through which we can ensure things like strong power on passwords, on device encryption, confirm the device has not been jailbroken, there are no unauthorized applications on the device and so on; the actual policies are crafted based on the needs of the business, but these precautions are pretty standard. If a device is out of compliance, we can shut it out automatically.

We also take pains to insure the users understand the policy and its requirements and actually sign a document committing them to abide. For example we will spell out the company's right to take the device if it is required for discovery in a legal proceeding.

The bottom line is that users want this, but we in IT are still responsible for protecting corporate data and systems, and we do have the tools to do this effectively. If organizations aren't doing that, that's just bad management.
Gravatar
dave michels 1/4/2013 10:28:37 AM

Michael,
I have no doubt that organizations that hire wireless consultants approach the BYOD fiasco with caution. I don't think this is representative of most organizations. What I keep hearing from end users is frustration that BYOD is not the solution they expected. I also hear the term BYOD used regularly to describe very different scenarios from BYOD means bring your own iPhone to BYOD means bring anything.

The point I really wanted to draw attention to is the variability in its interpretation. Which is exactly why organizations considering this path should attack it as project. BYOD is a means, not an end.
Gravatar
dave michels 1/4/2013 10:35:12 AM

Art,
The multi-modal contact center is much more than a BYOD topic, and it is really going to hit the proverbial fan with WebRTC. The fact that a customer has an iPad doesn't necessarily make rich communications such as video easier. They would need to install a client of some sort. But WebRTC could conceivably eliminate that requirement - changing the assumption.

Contact Centers have been able to avoid video communications despite the growth in the sector, but will start to change soon. Of course, not everyone wants to use video.
Gravatar
Art Rosenberg 1/5/2013 7:44:06 PM

Dave,

Don't disagree that the contact center is bigger than (consumer) BYOD, but mobile consumers will need more than legacy call centers have to offer. This will be particularly true for self-service "mobile apps" and mobile notifications for consumers/customers.

Informational video will be useful for customers, but not so much though for on-camera customer service conversations.

To Leave a Comment, Please Login or Register

CLP Central: Where Consultants, Vendors, and the Channel Connect
BC Summit 2016 UC Alerts
UC Blogs
UC ROI Tool RSS Feeds