{"id":4923,"date":"2026-05-07T13:45:00","date_gmt":"2026-05-07T13:45:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ucstrategies.com\/news\/?p=4923"},"modified":"2026-05-07T07:46:27","modified_gmt":"2026-05-07T07:46:27","slug":"amazon-nova-pro-aws-bedrock-model-guide-specs-pricing-2026","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ucstrategies.com\/news\/amazon-nova-pro-aws-bedrock-model-guide-specs-pricing-2026\/","title":{"rendered":"Amazon Nova Pro: AWS Bedrock Model Guide \u2014 Specs &#038; Pricing (2026)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Amazon announced a new AI model family in November 2024. They gave it a 300,000-token context window, multimodal capabilities, and direct integration into AWS Bedrock. They called it Nova Pro.<\/p>\n<p>Then they published zero benchmarks, zero pricing details, and zero technical documentation.<\/p>\n<p>For an industry that runs on leaderboards and performance comparisons, this is either remarkable confidence or a strategic gamble. AWS is asking enterprise customers to adopt a proprietary LLM based entirely on brand trust, not performance data. That&#8217;s a fundamentally different sales pitch than what OpenAI, Anthropic, or Google offers. And it changes how you evaluate this model.<\/p>\n<p>If you&#8217;re an AWS customer evaluating AI infrastructure in 2026, Nova Pro positions itself as your native option. No third-party APIs. No data leaving your AWS environment. No compliance friction from external model providers. But you&#8217;re making that decision without the benchmark scores, cost comparisons, or capability demonstrations that typically justify a seven-figure AI investment.<\/p>\n<p>This guide documents what we actually know about Amazon Nova Pro as of April 29, 2026, separates verified facts from marketing claims, and maps the real decision you&#8217;re facing: trust AWS&#8217;s infrastructure reputation enough to deploy an AI model with no public performance record, or stick with proven alternatives like <a href=\"https:\/\/ucstrategies.com\/news\/chatgpt-vs-claude-which-llm-should-you-choose-in-2026\/\">Claude 3.5 Sonnet and GPT-4o<\/a> that have transparent benchmarks but require sending data outside your AWS perimeter.<\/p>\n<h2>Amazon Nova Pro: What AWS Actually Disclosed<\/h2>\n<p><iframe title=\"Amazon Nova AI Explained: Micro, Lite, Pro, Premier + More\" width=\"1170\" height=\"658\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/7v7FmW5DgPw?feature=oembed\" frameborder=\"0\" allow=\"accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share\" referrerpolicy=\"strict-origin-when-cross-origin\" allowfullscreen><\/iframe><\/p>\n<p>The November 2024 announcement confirmed three things. First, Nova Pro is a multimodal model, meaning it processes text and at least one other input type (likely images, possibly audio or video). Second, it offers a <strong>300,000-token context window<\/strong>, which would make it competitive with GPT-4 Turbo&#8217;s 128,000 tokens and Claude 3.5 Sonnet&#8217;s 200,000 tokens. Third, it&#8217;s available exclusively through <strong>AWS Bedrock<\/strong>, Amazon&#8217;s managed foundation model service.<\/p>\n<p>Everything else is inference or absence.<\/p>\n<p>We don&#8217;t know the parameter count. Dense or mixture-of-experts architecture? Unknown. Training data sources and cutoff date? Not disclosed. Input modalities beyond text? Unspecified. Vision capabilities compared to GPT-4o Vision or Gemini 1.5 Pro? No benchmarks published. Function calling support? JSON mode? Streaming? The API documentation doesn&#8217;t exist in public AWS docs.<\/p>\n<p>AWS Bedrock launched in September 2023 as a managed service hosting third-party models like Claude, Llama, and Stable Diffusion. Nova Pro represents AWS&#8217;s first proprietary large language model family, shifting Amazon from model aggregator to model maker. That&#8217;s a significant strategic move. But the execution is opaque in ways that conflict with how the AI industry has operated since GPT-3.<\/p>\n<p>The practical implication: if you&#8217;re evaluating Nova Pro against alternatives, you can&#8217;t do a direct performance comparison. You can&#8217;t calculate cost per task. You can&#8217;t verify claimed capabilities through independent testing. You&#8217;re buying based on AWS&#8217;s infrastructure track record, not this model&#8217;s demonstrated performance.<\/p>\n<p>And that might be the point. AWS has built a $90 billion cloud business by being the reliable, boring choice. EC2 instances don&#8217;t publish benchmark wars against Azure VMs. RDS doesn&#8217;t compete on database leaderboards. AWS sells infrastructure trust, and Nova Pro extends that model to AI. The question is whether enterprise AI procurement works the same way as compute and storage.<\/p>\n<h2>Specs at a Glance<\/h2>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Specification<\/th>\n<th>Amazon Nova Pro<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>Developer<\/strong><\/td>\n<td>Amazon Web Services<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>Release Date<\/strong><\/td>\n<td>November 2024<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>Model Family<\/strong><\/td>\n<td>Nova<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>Parameters<\/strong><\/td>\n<td>Not disclosed<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>Architecture<\/strong><\/td>\n<td>Unknown (dense or MoE unspecified)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>Context Window<\/strong><\/td>\n<td>300,000 tokens (claimed, unverified)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>Modalities<\/strong><\/td>\n<td>Multimodal (specifics undisclosed)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>Training Data Cutoff<\/strong><\/td>\n<td>Not disclosed<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>Access Method<\/strong><\/td>\n<td>AWS Bedrock only<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>API Format<\/strong><\/td>\n<td>Bedrock API (OpenAI compatibility unknown)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>Pricing (Input)<\/strong><\/td>\n<td>Not published<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>Pricing (Output)<\/strong><\/td>\n<td>Not published<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>Rate Limits<\/strong><\/td>\n<td>Unknown<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>Open Source<\/strong><\/td>\n<td>No (proprietary)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>Fine-tuning<\/strong><\/td>\n<td>Unknown<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>Function Calling<\/strong><\/td>\n<td>Unknown<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>JSON Mode<\/strong><\/td>\n<td>Unknown<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>Streaming<\/strong><\/td>\n<td>Unknown<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p>The 300,000-token context window is the only concrete performance claim we can evaluate, and even that requires verification. GPT-4 Turbo claims 128,000 tokens but performs poorly beyond 64,000 in practice. Claude 3.5 Sonnet advertises 200,000 tokens and generally delivers. If Nova Pro&#8217;s 300,000-token window works at full capacity, it would handle entire codebases, multi-chapter documents, or complex multi-turn conversations without truncation.<\/p>\n<p>But theoretical context and practical context are different things. Attention mechanisms degrade with distance. Retrieval accuracy drops. Latency increases. Until independent testing confirms that Nova Pro maintains coherence across 300,000 tokens, treat this as a marketing number, not a deployment specification.<\/p>\n<p>The absence of pricing is the most immediate barrier to evaluation. Claude 3.5 Sonnet on Bedrock costs <strong>$3 per million input tokens<\/strong> and <strong>$15 per million output tokens<\/strong>. GPT-4o costs <strong>$2.50 input<\/strong> and <strong>$10 output<\/strong>. Without Nova Pro&#8217;s rates, you can&#8217;t build a budget. You can&#8217;t compare total cost of ownership. You can&#8217;t even estimate whether this model is positioned as a premium option or a cost-competitive alternative.<\/p>\n<p>The &#8220;unknown&#8221; fields in that specs table aren&#8217;t gaps we can fill with research. They&#8217;re gaps AWS chose not to fill with disclosure.<\/p>\n<h2>The Benchmark Problem: Zero Public Performance Data<\/h2>\n<p>Every major language model released since GPT-3 has published benchmark scores. MMLU for knowledge. HumanEval for coding. GPQA for scientific reasoning. These aren&#8217;t perfect measures, but they&#8217;re standardized comparisons that let you evaluate models against each other and against your specific needs.<\/p>\n<p>Amazon Nova Pro has published none of them.<\/p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Benchmark<\/th>\n<th>Amazon Nova Pro<\/th>\n<th>GPT-5.4 (Mar 2026)<\/th>\n<th>Gemini 3.1 Pro (Apr 2026)<\/th>\n<th>Claude Opus 4.6 (Feb 2026)<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>GPQA Diamond<\/strong><\/td>\n<td>No data<\/td>\n<td>Not published<\/td>\n<td>94.3%<\/td>\n<td>91.3%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>ARC-AGI-2<\/strong><\/td>\n<td>No data<\/td>\n<td>73.3%<\/td>\n<td>77.1%<\/td>\n<td>~68-72% (est.)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>GDPval<\/strong><\/td>\n<td>No data<\/td>\n<td>83.0%<\/td>\n<td>Not published<\/td>\n<td>59.6%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>MMLU-Pro<\/strong><\/td>\n<td>No data<\/td>\n<td>Not published<\/td>\n<td>Not published<\/td>\n<td>Not published<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>SWE-bench Verified<\/strong><\/td>\n<td>No data<\/td>\n<td>Not published<\/td>\n<td>Not published<\/td>\n<td>Not published<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p>The competitive landscape shows Gemini 3.1 Pro leading on GPQA Diamond at <strong>94.3%<\/strong>, while GPT-5.4 achieved <strong>73.3% on ARC-AGI-2<\/strong> and <strong>83.0% on GDPval<\/strong>. Claude Opus 4.6 hit <strong>91.3% on GPQA Diamond<\/strong> but fell to <strong>59.6% on GDPval<\/strong>. These scores tell you where each model excels. GPT-5.4 handles abstract reasoning better than most. Gemini 3.1 Pro dominates graduate-level science questions. Claude Opus 4.6 is strong on reasoning but weaker on validation tasks.<\/p>\n<p>Where does Nova Pro fit? We don&#8217;t know.<\/p>\n<p>This isn&#8217;t just an academic problem. Benchmarks predict real-world performance. A model that scores 90% on MMLU will generally handle knowledge-intensive tasks better than one that scores 70%. A model that hits 80% on HumanEval will write better code than one at 50%. Without these scores, you&#8217;re deploying blind.<\/p>\n<p>The absence is particularly strange given AWS&#8217;s enterprise focus. Enterprise buyers demand proof. They run pilots. They compare vendors. They build scorecards. AWS knows this. They&#8217;ve published performance benchmarks for EC2 instances, RDS databases, and S3 storage for decades. The decision to launch Nova Pro without equivalent AI performance data suggests either the benchmarks aren&#8217;t competitive or AWS believes their enterprise relationships can carry adoption without them.<\/p>\n<p>For now, the only performance comparison you can make is inference: if AWS thought Nova Pro&#8217;s scores were impressive, they&#8217;d publish them. The silence implies the numbers either don&#8217;t exist yet or don&#8217;t tell the story AWS wants to tell.<\/p>\n<h2>AWS-Native Integration: The Real Selling Point<\/h2>\n<p>Nova Pro isn&#8217;t competing on benchmarks because it&#8217;s competing on infrastructure. The pitch is simple: if you&#8217;re already running on AWS, Nova Pro eliminates the friction of third-party AI services.<\/p>\n<p>Every other model on Bedrock (Claude, Llama, Stable Diffusion) is a hosted third-party service. When you call Claude through Bedrock, your request still routes through Anthropic&#8217;s systems. Your data touches their infrastructure. You&#8217;re subject to their rate limits, their uptime, their terms of service. It&#8217;s convenient, but it&#8217;s not native.<\/p>\n<p>Nova Pro is architected as a first-party AWS service. That means direct access to AWS&#8217;s internal service mesh. Tighter integration with S3 for document processing. Lower latency connections to Lambda for function execution. Simpler IAM policies without cross-account permissions. Potential for regional deployment that keeps data in specific AWS regions without third-party data processing agreements.<\/p>\n<p>The technical advantage is latency and security. Third-party API calls add 50-200ms of overhead just from network routing. For real-time applications like customer service chatbots or code completion, that&#8217;s the difference between responsive and sluggish. For regulated industries like healthcare or finance, eliminating third-party data sharing simplifies compliance. Your data never leaves AWS infrastructure. No separate data processing agreement with Anthropic or OpenAI. One vendor relationship instead of two.<\/p>\n<p>But this advantage only matters if Nova Pro&#8217;s performance is competitive. A 100ms latency improvement doesn&#8217;t help if the model produces worse results. Simplified compliance doesn&#8217;t matter if the model can&#8217;t handle your use case. AWS is betting that for their core enterprise customers, infrastructure integration plus &#8220;good enough&#8221; performance beats best-in-class performance with integration friction.<\/p>\n<p>We won&#8217;t know if that bet pays off until someone publishes comparative latency tests (Nova Pro vs Claude on Bedrock vs direct Claude API calls) and real-world accuracy comparisons (Nova Pro vs GPT-4o on actual enterprise tasks, not synthetic benchmarks).<\/p>\n<p>The strategic significance is clear, though. If AWS can prove performance parity with GPT-4o or Claude at lower latency for AWS-native workloads, they shift the enterprise AI decision from &#8220;which model is best&#8221; to &#8220;which integrated system is best.&#8221; That&#8217;s a game AWS has won before. RDS didn&#8217;t beat self-hosted PostgreSQL on raw performance. It won on operational simplicity. Nova Pro is applying the same playbook to AI.<\/p>\n<h2>Enterprise Use Cases: Where Nova Pro Could Fit<\/h2>\n<p>Without benchmark data or API documentation, these use cases are theoretical. But they&#8217;re grounded in AWS Bedrock&#8217;s existing enterprise patterns and the claimed 300,000-token context window and multimodal capabilities.<\/p>\n<h3>Enterprise Document Intelligence<\/h3>\n<p>Processing internal financial reports, compliance documents, and multi-format contracts (PDF, Excel, scanned images) within AWS-secured environments. The 300,000-token context window would support full quarterly reports without chunking. Multimodal capability would handle mixed formats. For businesses already running on AWS infrastructure, Nova Pro could eliminate the compliance friction of sending sensitive documents to external AI APIs.<\/p>\n<p>This mirrors patterns we&#8217;ve seen drive adoption in <a href=\"https:\/\/ucstrategies.com\/news\/best-ai-business-to-start-in-2026-solo-founder-playbook\/\">AI business automation strategies<\/a> where data residency requirements force architectural decisions. The advantage isn&#8217;t that Nova Pro analyzes documents better than GPT-4o. It&#8217;s that the documents never leave your S3 buckets.<\/p>\n<h3>Regulated Industry AI (Healthcare and Finance)<\/h3>\n<p>HIPAA and SOC 2 compliant AI analysis where data cannot leave AWS regions. AWS Bedrock already offers compliance certifications. A first-party model avoids third-party data sharing entirely. While <a href=\"https:\/\/ucstrategies.com\/news\/anthropic-launches-claude-for-healthcare-challenging-chatgpt-health\/\">Claude for Healthcare<\/a> requires Anthropic&#8217;s infrastructure, Nova Pro could offer similar capabilities without data leaving AWS&#8217;s certified environments.<\/p>\n<p>The regulatory advantage is real. Every external API call creates a compliance checkpoint. Every third-party vendor requires a business associate agreement. Every data transfer across cloud providers triggers audit requirements. Nova Pro simplifies this to a single AWS contract.<\/p>\n<h3>Real-Time Customer Service (AWS Connect Integration)<\/h3>\n<p>AI-powered call center analysis and response generation integrated with Amazon Connect. Native AWS integration could reduce API latency versus external models. Unlike <a href=\"https:\/\/ucstrategies.com\/news\/best-ai-chatbots-2026-i-tested-chatgpt-claude-gemini-perplexity-and-grok\/\">standalone AI chatbots<\/a>, a Bedrock-native model could directly access customer data from DynamoDB and S3 without middleware.<\/p>\n<p>The latency math matters here. A typical Claude API call takes 200-400ms before the first token. A Nova Pro call through Bedrock&#8217;s internal mesh could theoretically hit 50-100ms. For a customer service agent waiting for AI suggestions during a live call, that&#8217;s the difference between useful and disruptive.<\/p>\n<h3>Multimodal Content Moderation<\/h3>\n<p>Analyzing user-generated content (text, images, video frames) for AWS-hosted platforms. The multimodal capability claim suggests Nova Pro could handle this, and AWS already offers Rekognition for image analysis. Combining vision and language understanding in a single model call reduces complexity.<\/p>\n<p>Effective content analysis requires understanding context across formats, exactly what multimodal models promise. But without vision benchmarks, we can&#8217;t verify whether Nova Pro&#8217;s image understanding matches GPT-4o Vision or Gemini 1.5 Pro.<\/p>\n<h3>Infrastructure-as-Code Generation<\/h3>\n<p>Generating CloudFormation templates, Lambda functions, and AWS CDK code from natural language descriptions. AWS-specific training data would improve accuracy versus general-purpose models. While <a href=\"https:\/\/ucstrategies.com\/news\/github-copilot-review-2026-pricing-models-workspace-is-it-worth-it\/\">GitHub Copilot<\/a> excels at general code, AWS-specific infrastructure code requires deep service knowledge.<\/p>\n<p>This is where proprietary training data creates real differentiation. If Amazon trained Nova Pro on internal AWS documentation, CloudFormation examples, and service integration patterns, it could outperform GPT-4o on AWS-specific tasks even if it lags on general coding benchmarks.<\/p>\n<h3>Business Intelligence and Data Analysis<\/h3>\n<p>Natural language queries against AWS data warehouses (Redshift, Athena) with 300,000-token context for complex multi-table analysis. Long context enables full schema understanding without summarization. The <a href=\"https:\/\/ucstrategies.com\/news\/chatgpt-vs-claude-which-llm-should-you-choose-in-2026\/\">ChatGPT versus Claude<\/a> debate often ignores infrastructure lock-in. Nova Pro&#8217;s advantage is eliminating that choice for AWS shops.<\/p>\n<h3>Autonomous Agent Workflows (Step Functions Integration)<\/h3>\n<p>Multi-step business process automation using AWS Step Functions with LLM decision-making at each stage. Native integration could enable stateful agent workflows without external dependencies. True <a href=\"https:\/\/ucstrategies.com\/news\/what-is-an-ai-agent-from-chatbot-to-autonomous-action-clearly-explained\/\">AI agents<\/a> require orchestration. AWS Step Functions plus Nova Pro could offer this without external dependencies.<\/p>\n<h3>Global Deployment with Regional Data Residency<\/h3>\n<p>Multi-region AI deployment where data must stay in specific AWS regions (EU, Asia-Pacific). AWS Bedrock supports regional deployment. A first-party model simplifies compliance compared to third-party services. While <a href=\"https:\/\/ucstrategies.com\/news\/what-googles-new-auto-browse-removes-from-your-daily-to-do-list\/\">Google&#8217;s AI features<\/a> require Google Cloud, enterprises with AWS commitments need equivalent capabilities.<\/p>\n<h2>How to Actually Use Nova Pro (If You Can Get Access)<\/h2>\n<p>The API documentation problem is severe. As of April 29, 2026, no official Nova Pro API reference exists in public AWS documentation. The following describes the expected integration pattern based on AWS Bedrock&#8217;s standard API structure, but treat this as speculative until AWS publishes actual docs.<\/p>\n<p>You&#8217;d access Nova Pro through the AWS Bedrock API using the boto3 SDK for Python or the AWS SDK for JavaScript. The model would have a unique identifier (likely something like amazon.nova-pro-v1 or nova-pro-2024-11) that you&#8217;d specify in your API calls. Authentication happens through standard AWS IAM credentials, which means you can use existing role-based access controls and don&#8217;t need separate API keys.<\/p>\n<p>The request format would follow Bedrock&#8217;s existing pattern: you&#8217;d send a JSON payload with your prompt, specify parameters like temperature and max tokens, and receive a streaming or non-streaming response. If Nova Pro supports multimodal inputs (which the marketing claims suggest), you&#8217;d likely include image data as base64-encoded strings or S3 URIs, similar to how Claude handles vision inputs on Bedrock.<\/p>\n<p>The unknowns are significant. Does Nova Pro use the same parameter names as other Bedrock models? Are there Nova-specific parameters for controlling the 300,000-token context window? How do you specify which modalities to use? What&#8217;s the token counting method (GPT-style, Claude-style, or something new)? Without official documentation, you&#8217;re guessing.<\/p>\n<p>The practical approach: if you have AWS Bedrock access, check the console for Nova Pro availability. Test with simple prompts first. Monitor latency and token usage. Compare results to Claude 3.5 Sonnet or GPT-4o on the same tasks. Document what works and what doesn&#8217;t, because AWS hasn&#8217;t done that publicly.<\/p>\n<p>For actual code examples and SDK integration details, you&#8217;d need to check AWS Bedrock&#8217;s official documentation at aws.amazon.com\/bedrock\/docs, but as of this writing, Nova Pro isn&#8217;t documented there.<\/p>\n<h2>Getting the Best Results: Prompting Strategies (Theoretical)<\/h2>\n<p>Without access to the model or official documentation, these prompting recommendations are educated guesses based on AWS Bedrock patterns and general enterprise LLM behavior. Test everything when you get access.<\/p>\n<p>Start with the context window strategy. If 300,000 tokens is real and functional, test whether loading full documents performs better than chunking. GPT-4&#8217;s 128,000-token window often works better with chunking and retrieval, but Nova Pro&#8217;s larger window might change that calculation. Try feeding it an entire technical manual or codebase and see if it maintains coherence across the full context.<\/p>\n<p>For AWS-specific tasks, use explicit service names and terminology. If Amazon trained Nova Pro on AWS documentation, prompts that reference CloudFormation, Lambda, S3, and other services by their official names might perform better than generic cloud terminology. Test prompts like &#8220;create a CloudFormation template for a three-tier web application with RDS and ElastiCache&#8221; versus &#8220;create infrastructure code for a web app with a database and cache.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Temperature settings matter for enterprise use cases. Most enterprise models default to lower temperatures (0.3 to 0.5) for consistency and accuracy. Creative tasks like marketing copy might benefit from higher temperatures (0.7 to 0.9), but compliance documents and code generation need deterministic outputs. Start conservative and increase only if you need more variation.<\/p>\n<p>For multimodal prompts, the format is unknown. Test different approaches: text description followed by image reference, image reference followed by text questions, interleaved text and images. Document what works because AWS hasn&#8217;t published best practices.<\/p>\n<p>System prompts are likely supported (all major models use them), but AWS may enforce specific constraints for compliance and safety. Test whether you can override default system prompts or if they&#8217;re locked. For regulated industries, locked system prompts might actually be a feature, ensuring consistent safety guardrails across all applications.<\/p>\n<p>What probably won&#8217;t work: tricks optimized for GPT-4 or Claude. Each model has quirks. Chain-of-thought prompting that works brilliantly on Claude might underperform on Nova Pro. Few-shot examples that help GPT-4o might confuse a model trained differently. Don&#8217;t assume techniques transfer. Test everything.<\/p>\n<h2>What Doesn&#8217;t Work: Known Limitations and Gaps<\/h2>\n<p>The biggest limitation is transparency. Zero public benchmarks means you can&#8217;t verify claimed capabilities. Zero pricing means you can&#8217;t budget accurately. Zero API documentation means you can&#8217;t build reliable integrations without trial and error. This isn&#8217;t a technical limitation of the model itself. It&#8217;s a limitation AWS imposed by choosing not to disclose this information.<\/p>\n<p>AWS lock-in is absolute. Nova Pro cannot be deployed outside AWS infrastructure. No multi-cloud strategy. No local deployment. No fallback if AWS Bedrock has an outage. You&#8217;re committing to a single vendor for your AI infrastructure, which creates both operational risk and negotiating disadvantage.<\/p>\n<p>Rate limits are unknown. Enterprises need to plan capacity. If Nova Pro has aggressive rate limiting, it might not support high-throughput applications. If it has generous limits, it could handle large-scale deployments. Without published numbers, you can&#8217;t design your architecture.<\/p>\n<p>The multimodal capabilities are unspecified. &#8220;Multimodal&#8221; could mean text plus images. Or text plus images plus audio. Or text plus images plus video. We don&#8217;t know supported formats, resolution limits, or vision performance. Saying a model is multimodal without details is like saying a car has an engine without specifying horsepower.<\/p>\n<p>No developer community exists. Unlike Hugging Face models with thousands of community implementations, or OpenAI models with extensive third-party tutorials, Nova Pro has no public developer ecosystem. No GitHub repos. No Reddit discussions. No Stack Overflow answers. You&#8217;re figuring everything out alone.<\/p>\n<p>The model card is missing. The EU AI Act Article 13 and US Executive Order 14110 push for AI transparency through model cards documenting capabilities, limitations, training data, and intended uses. AWS published none of this for Nova Pro. That&#8217;s not just a documentation gap. It&#8217;s a compliance risk for regulated industries.<\/p>\n<p>Version control is unclear. No versioning system disclosed. No way to pin to specific model versions for reproducibility. No deprecation timeline for older versions. If AWS updates Nova Pro and changes behavior, your applications might break without warning.<\/p>\n<h2>Security and Compliance: What AWS Inherited<\/h2>\n<p>AWS Bedrock carries enterprise certifications that Nova Pro inherits by default. SOC 1, SOC 2, SOC 3 for service organization controls. ISO 27001, 27017, 27018, and 27701 for information security. PCI DSS Level 1 for payment card data. HIPAA eligibility for healthcare. FedRAMP Moderate for US government workloads. GDPR compliance with EU data residency options.<\/p>\n<p>These certifications are real and audited. AWS has been doing this for 18 years. The compliance infrastructure is mature. For enterprises evaluating AI vendors, this is table stakes.<\/p>\n<p>But Nova Pro-specific policies are undocumented. What&#8217;s the data retention policy for API requests? AWS Bedrock&#8217;s default is user-controlled (you decide when to delete logs), but is that confirmed for Nova Pro? Are customer prompts and responses used to train or improve the model? AWS typically offers opt-out for data usage, but is that explicitly documented for Nova Pro?<\/p>\n<p>Geographic processing matters for data residency. Bedrock supports regional endpoints (US East, EU West, Asia Pacific), but where does Nova Pro actually run inference? If you send a request to the EU region, does it stay in EU data centers, or does it route to US infrastructure? For GDPR compliance, this isn&#8217;t academic.<\/p>\n<p>The competitive advantage versus OpenAI and Anthropic is clear: data stays within AWS infrastructure. No third-party API calls. No separate data processing agreements. For enterprises already committed to AWS, this simplifies compliance reviews. Versus Azure OpenAI, the compliance posture is similar (Microsoft has equivalent certifications), but Nova Pro avoids OpenAI&#8217;s data processing agreements entirely.<\/p>\n<p>Questions to ask your AWS account team: Is customer data used to train or improve Nova Pro? What&#8217;s the data retention policy for API requests? Are there region-specific model versions for data residency? How does Nova Pro handle PII and PHI in prompts? Get written answers, because the public documentation doesn&#8217;t provide them.<\/p>\n<h2>Version History and Updates<\/h2>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Date<\/th>\n<th>Version<\/th>\n<th>Changes<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>November 2024<\/td>\n<td>Initial release<\/td>\n<td>Amazon Nova Pro announced, availability on AWS Bedrock (unverified)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>November 2024 &#8211; April 2026<\/td>\n<td>Unknown<\/td>\n<td>No documented updates, patches, or version increments<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p>The absence of version history is telling. OpenAI publishes dated model versions (gpt-4-0314, gpt-4-0613). Anthropic uses clear version naming (Claude 3 Opus, Claude 3.5 Sonnet). Google releases dated versions (Gemini 1.5 Pro 001, 002). Amazon has published nothing.<\/p>\n<p>For enterprises, this creates reproducibility problems. You can&#8217;t pin to a specific model version. You can&#8217;t track performance changes over time. You don&#8217;t know if or when model updates occur. If Nova Pro&#8217;s behavior changes and breaks your application, you have no way to roll back to a previous version.<\/p>\n<h2>Latest News<\/h2>\n<p><!-- AUTO-FEED: WordPress tag query, do not edit --><\/p>\n<h2>More on UCStrategies<\/h2>\n<p>Nova Pro enters a market where <a href=\"https:\/\/ucstrategies.com\/news\/google-gemini-wants-you-to-forget-chatgpt-with-this-new-feature\/\">Google&#8217;s enterprise AI push<\/a> and Microsoft&#8217;s Azure OpenAI already have multi-year head starts. The competitive landscape isn&#8217;t just about model performance. It&#8217;s about developer ecosystems, integration patterns, and enterprise relationships.<\/p>\n<p>For businesses evaluating <a href=\"https:\/\/ucstrategies.com\/news\/ai-is-not-making-you-smarter-unless-you-use-it-this-way\/\">effective AI implementation<\/a>, the infrastructure question often matters more than the model question. A slightly worse model with seamless integration can outperform a better model with integration friction. That&#8217;s Nova Pro&#8217;s bet.<\/p>\n<p>The principles that make <a href=\"https:\/\/ucstrategies.com\/news\/cursor-ai-guide-specs-pricing-how-it-compares-to-copilot-2026\/\">AI coding assistants<\/a> effective (tight IDE integration, fast response times, context awareness) apply to enterprise AI infrastructure. Nova Pro&#8217;s advantage isn&#8217;t raw capability. It&#8217;s reducing the distance between your data and the model.<\/p>\n<p>But without transparency, that advantage is theoretical. The <a href=\"https:\/\/ucstrategies.com\/news\/best-ai-detectors-in-2026-top-tools-to-detect-gpt-4o-claude-and-ai-content\/\">AI detection challenges<\/a> facing GPT-4o and Claude apply equally to Nova Pro. Actually, they apply worse, because without public samples, detection tools can&#8217;t train on Nova Pro&#8217;s output patterns.<\/p>\n<h2>Common Questions About Amazon Nova Pro<\/h2>\n<h3>Is Amazon Nova Pro actually available on Bedrock?<\/h3>\n<p>The November 2024 announcement claimed availability, but as of April 29, 2026, there are no public user reports, case studies, or documentation confirming access. Check your AWS Bedrock console directly. If you don&#8217;t see Nova Pro listed among available models, contact your AWS account team for clarification.<\/p>\n<h3>How does Nova Pro pricing compare to Claude or GPT-4o on Bedrock?<\/h3>\n<p>Pricing is not published. For reference, Claude 3.5 Sonnet costs $3 per million input tokens and $15 per million output tokens on Bedrock. GPT-4o costs $2.50 input and $10 output. Without Nova Pro&#8217;s rates, you can&#8217;t build a comparison. Contact AWS for enterprise pricing.<\/p>\n<h3>Can I use Nova Pro with the OpenAI Python SDK?<\/h3>\n<p>Unknown. AWS Bedrock uses its own API format through the boto3 SDK. Some Bedrock models support OpenAI-compatible endpoints, but Nova Pro&#8217;s compatibility is undocumented. Assume you&#8217;ll need to use AWS&#8217;s native SDK until proven otherwise.<\/p>\n<h3>What&#8217;s the actual context window, 300,000 tokens or less?<\/h3>\n<p>The claim is 300,000 tokens, but this is unverified. GPT-4 Turbo claims 128,000 but performs poorly beyond 64,000 in practice. Test with your actual workloads. Load a full document and verify coherence across the entire context before trusting the theoretical limit.<\/p>\n<h3>Does Nova Pro support function calling and JSON mode?<\/h3>\n<p>Not documented. Function calling lets models execute code or API calls. JSON mode guarantees valid JSON output. Both are critical for enterprise applications. Claude 3.5 Sonnet supports native function calling. GPT-4o has JSON mode. Nova Pro&#8217;s capabilities are unknown.<\/p>\n<h3>Is Nova Pro trained on AWS customer data?<\/h3>\n<p>Not disclosed. AWS&#8217;s general policy is that customer data is not used for service improvement unless you opt in, but Nova Pro&#8217;s training data sources are completely unknown. Review your AWS Bedrock data processing agreement and ask for written confirmation.<\/p>\n<h3>How does Nova Pro&#8217;s multimodal capability compare to GPT-4o Vision?<\/h3>\n<p>Cannot compare. No specifications on supported image formats, resolution limits, or vision benchmark scores. &#8220;Multimodal&#8221; could mean text plus images, text plus audio, or text plus video. Test with your specific use case.<\/p>\n<h3>Should I wait for Nova Pro or just use Claude 3.5 Sonnet on Bedrock?<\/h3>\n<p>Depends on your risk tolerance. Claude 3.5 Sonnet has public benchmarks (88.7% GPQA Diamond), known pricing, and extensive documentation. Nova Pro offers theoretical AWS-native advantages but zero performance data. If you need proven capabilities now, use Claude. If you can run parallel tests and have budget flexibility, test both.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Amazon announced a new AI model family in November 2024. They gave it a 300,000-token context window, multimodal capabilities, and direct integration into AWS Bedrock. They called it Nova Pro. Then they published zero benchmarks, zero pricing details, and zero technical documentation. For an industry that runs on leaderboards and performance comparisons, this is either [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":4935,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[14],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-4923","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-reviews"},"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.2 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Amazon Nova Pro: AWS Bedrock Model Guide \u2014 Specs &amp; Pricing (2026)<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/ucstrategies.com\/news\/amazon-nova-pro-aws-bedrock-model-guide-specs-pricing-2026\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Amazon Nova Pro: AWS Bedrock Model Guide \u2014 Specs &amp; Pricing (2026)\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Amazon announced a new AI model family in November 2024. They gave it a 300,000-token context window, multimodal capabilities, and direct integration into AWS Bedrock. They called it Nova Pro. Then they published zero benchmarks, zero pricing details, and zero technical documentation. For an industry that runs on leaderboards and performance comparisons, this is either [&hellip;]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/ucstrategies.com\/news\/amazon-nova-pro-aws-bedrock-model-guide-specs-pricing-2026\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ucstrategies News\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-05-07T13:45:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/ucstrategies.com\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/shutterstock_2604439159.webp\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1500\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"1000\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/webp\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Alex Morgan\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Alex Morgan\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"19 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"NewsArticle\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ucstrategies.com\/news\/amazon-nova-pro-aws-bedrock-model-guide-specs-pricing-2026\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ucstrategies.com\/news\/amazon-nova-pro-aws-bedrock-model-guide-specs-pricing-2026\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Alex Morgan\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ucstrategies.com\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/c6289d69ea8633c3ad86f49232fd0b40\"},\"headline\":\"Amazon Nova Pro: AWS Bedrock Model Guide \u2014 Specs &#038; Pricing (2026)\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-05-07T13:45:00+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ucstrategies.com\/news\/amazon-nova-pro-aws-bedrock-model-guide-specs-pricing-2026\/\"},\"wordCount\":4046,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ucstrategies.com\/news\/amazon-nova-pro-aws-bedrock-model-guide-specs-pricing-2026\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/ucstrategies.com\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/shutterstock_2604439159.webp\",\"articleSection\":\"Reviews\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/ucstrategies.com\/news\/amazon-nova-pro-aws-bedrock-model-guide-specs-pricing-2026\/#respond\"]}],\"dateModified\":\"2026-05-07T13:45:00+00:00\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ucstrategies.com\/news\/#organization\"}},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ucstrategies.com\/news\/amazon-nova-pro-aws-bedrock-model-guide-specs-pricing-2026\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/ucstrategies.com\/news\/amazon-nova-pro-aws-bedrock-model-guide-specs-pricing-2026\/\",\"name\":\"Amazon Nova Pro: AWS Bedrock Model Guide \u2014 Specs & Pricing (2026)\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ucstrategies.com\/news\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ucstrategies.com\/news\/amazon-nova-pro-aws-bedrock-model-guide-specs-pricing-2026\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ucstrategies.com\/news\/amazon-nova-pro-aws-bedrock-model-guide-specs-pricing-2026\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/ucstrategies.com\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/shutterstock_2604439159.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-05-07T13:45:00+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ucstrategies.com\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/c6289d69ea8633c3ad86f49232fd0b40\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ucstrategies.com\/news\/amazon-nova-pro-aws-bedrock-model-guide-specs-pricing-2026\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/ucstrategies.com\/news\/amazon-nova-pro-aws-bedrock-model-guide-specs-pricing-2026\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ucstrategies.com\/news\/amazon-nova-pro-aws-bedrock-model-guide-specs-pricing-2026\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/ucstrategies.com\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/shutterstock_2604439159.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/ucstrategies.com\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/shutterstock_2604439159.webp\",\"width\":1500,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"amazon nova pro\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ucstrategies.com\/news\/amazon-nova-pro-aws-bedrock-model-guide-specs-pricing-2026\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/ucstrategies.com\/news\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Amazon Nova Pro: AWS Bedrock Model Guide \u2014 Specs &#038; Pricing (2026)\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ucstrategies.com\/news\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/ucstrategies.com\/news\/\",\"name\":\"Ucstrategies News\",\"description\":\"Insights and tools for productive work\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/ucstrategies.com\/news\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ucstrategies.com\/news\/#organization\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ucstrategies.com\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/c6289d69ea8633c3ad86f49232fd0b40\",\"name\":\"Alex Morgan\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ucstrategies.com\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/alex-morgan\/image\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/ucstrategies.com\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/cropped-Nouveau-projet-11.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/ucstrategies.com\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/cropped-Nouveau-projet-11.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Alex Morgan - AI & Automation Journalist at UCStrategies\"},\"description\":\"I write about artificial intelligence as it shows up in real life \u2014 not in demos or press releases. I focus on how AI changes work, habits, and decision-making once it\u2019s actually used inside tools, teams, and everyday workflows. Most of my reporting looks at second-order effects: what people stop doing, what gets automated quietly, and how responsibility shifts when software starts making decisions for us.\",\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/ucstrategies.com\/news\/author\/alex-morgan\/\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/ucstrategies.com\/news\/author\/alex-morgan\/\",\"jobTitle\":\"AI & Automation Journalist\",\"worksFor\":{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ucstrategies.com\/news\/#organization\",\"name\":\"UCStrategies\"},\"knowsAbout\":[\"Artificial Intelligence\",\"Large Language Models\",\"AI Agents\",\"AI Tools Reviews\",\"Automation\",\"Machine Learning\",\"Prompt Engineering\",\"AI Coding Assistants\"]},{\"@type\":[\"Organization\",\"NewsMediaOrganization\"],\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ucstrategies.com\/news\/#organization\",\"name\":\"UCStrategies\",\"legalName\":\"UC Strategies\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/ucstrategies.com\/news\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ucstrategies.com\/news\/#logo\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/ucstrategies.com\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/cropped-Nouveau-projet-11.jpg\",\"width\":500,\"height\":500,\"caption\":\"UCStrategies Logo\"},\"description\":\"Expert news, reviews and analysis on AI tools, unified communications, and workplace technology.\",\"foundingDate\":\"2020\",\"ethicsPolicy\":\"https:\/\/ucstrategies.com\/news\/editorial-policy\/\",\"correctionsPolicy\":\"https:\/\/ucstrategies.com\/news\/editorial-policy\/#corrections-policy\",\"masthead\":\"https:\/\/ucstrategies.com\/news\/about-us\/\",\"actionableFeedbackPolicy\":\"https:\/\/ucstrategies.com\/news\/editorial-policy\/\",\"publishingPrinciples\":\"https:\/\/ucstrategies.com\/news\/editorial-policy\/\",\"ownershipFundingInfo\":\"https:\/\/ucstrategies.com\/news\/about-us\/\",\"noBylinesPolicy\":\"https:\/\/ucstrategies.com\/news\/editorial-policy\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Amazon Nova Pro: AWS Bedrock Model Guide \u2014 Specs & Pricing (2026)","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/ucstrategies.com\/news\/amazon-nova-pro-aws-bedrock-model-guide-specs-pricing-2026\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Amazon Nova Pro: AWS Bedrock Model Guide \u2014 Specs & Pricing (2026)","og_description":"Amazon announced a new AI model family in November 2024. They gave it a 300,000-token context window, multimodal capabilities, and direct integration into AWS Bedrock. They called it Nova Pro. Then they published zero benchmarks, zero pricing details, and zero technical documentation. For an industry that runs on leaderboards and performance comparisons, this is either [&hellip;]","og_url":"https:\/\/ucstrategies.com\/news\/amazon-nova-pro-aws-bedrock-model-guide-specs-pricing-2026\/","og_site_name":"Ucstrategies News","article_published_time":"2026-05-07T13:45:00+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1500,"height":1000,"url":"https:\/\/ucstrategies.com\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/shutterstock_2604439159.webp","type":"image\/webp"}],"author":"Alex Morgan","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Alex Morgan","Est. reading time":"19 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"NewsArticle","@id":"https:\/\/ucstrategies.com\/news\/amazon-nova-pro-aws-bedrock-model-guide-specs-pricing-2026\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/ucstrategies.com\/news\/amazon-nova-pro-aws-bedrock-model-guide-specs-pricing-2026\/"},"author":{"name":"Alex Morgan","@id":"https:\/\/ucstrategies.com\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/c6289d69ea8633c3ad86f49232fd0b40"},"headline":"Amazon Nova Pro: AWS Bedrock Model Guide \u2014 Specs &#038; Pricing (2026)","datePublished":"2026-05-07T13:45:00+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/ucstrategies.com\/news\/amazon-nova-pro-aws-bedrock-model-guide-specs-pricing-2026\/"},"wordCount":4046,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/ucstrategies.com\/news\/amazon-nova-pro-aws-bedrock-model-guide-specs-pricing-2026\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/ucstrategies.com\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/shutterstock_2604439159.webp","articleSection":"Reviews","inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/ucstrategies.com\/news\/amazon-nova-pro-aws-bedrock-model-guide-specs-pricing-2026\/#respond"]}],"dateModified":"2026-05-07T13:45:00+00:00","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/ucstrategies.com\/news\/#organization"}},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/ucstrategies.com\/news\/amazon-nova-pro-aws-bedrock-model-guide-specs-pricing-2026\/","url":"https:\/\/ucstrategies.com\/news\/amazon-nova-pro-aws-bedrock-model-guide-specs-pricing-2026\/","name":"Amazon Nova Pro: AWS Bedrock Model Guide \u2014 Specs & Pricing (2026)","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/ucstrategies.com\/news\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/ucstrategies.com\/news\/amazon-nova-pro-aws-bedrock-model-guide-specs-pricing-2026\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/ucstrategies.com\/news\/amazon-nova-pro-aws-bedrock-model-guide-specs-pricing-2026\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/ucstrategies.com\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/shutterstock_2604439159.webp","datePublished":"2026-05-07T13:45:00+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/ucstrategies.com\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/c6289d69ea8633c3ad86f49232fd0b40"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/ucstrategies.com\/news\/amazon-nova-pro-aws-bedrock-model-guide-specs-pricing-2026\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/ucstrategies.com\/news\/amazon-nova-pro-aws-bedrock-model-guide-specs-pricing-2026\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/ucstrategies.com\/news\/amazon-nova-pro-aws-bedrock-model-guide-specs-pricing-2026\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/ucstrategies.com\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/shutterstock_2604439159.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/ucstrategies.com\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/shutterstock_2604439159.webp","width":1500,"height":1000,"caption":"amazon nova pro"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/ucstrategies.com\/news\/amazon-nova-pro-aws-bedrock-model-guide-specs-pricing-2026\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/ucstrategies.com\/news\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Amazon Nova Pro: AWS Bedrock Model Guide \u2014 Specs &#038; Pricing (2026)"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/ucstrategies.com\/news\/#website","url":"https:\/\/ucstrategies.com\/news\/","name":"Ucstrategies News","description":"Insights and tools for productive work","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/ucstrategies.com\/news\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/ucstrategies.com\/news\/#organization"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/ucstrategies.com\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/c6289d69ea8633c3ad86f49232fd0b40","name":"Alex Morgan","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/ucstrategies.com\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/alex-morgan\/image","url":"https:\/\/ucstrategies.com\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/cropped-Nouveau-projet-11.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/ucstrategies.com\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/cropped-Nouveau-projet-11.jpg","caption":"Alex Morgan - AI & Automation Journalist at UCStrategies"},"description":"I write about artificial intelligence as it shows up in real life \u2014 not in demos or press releases. I focus on how AI changes work, habits, and decision-making once it\u2019s actually used inside tools, teams, and everyday workflows. Most of my reporting looks at second-order effects: what people stop doing, what gets automated quietly, and how responsibility shifts when software starts making decisions for us.","sameAs":["https:\/\/ucstrategies.com\/news\/author\/alex-morgan\/"],"url":"https:\/\/ucstrategies.com\/news\/author\/alex-morgan\/","jobTitle":"AI & Automation Journalist","worksFor":{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/ucstrategies.com\/news\/#organization","name":"UCStrategies"},"knowsAbout":["Artificial Intelligence","Large Language Models","AI Agents","AI Tools Reviews","Automation","Machine Learning","Prompt Engineering","AI Coding Assistants"]},{"@type":["Organization","NewsMediaOrganization"],"@id":"https:\/\/ucstrategies.com\/news\/#organization","name":"UCStrategies","legalName":"UC Strategies","url":"https:\/\/ucstrategies.com\/news\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","@id":"https:\/\/ucstrategies.com\/news\/#logo","url":"https:\/\/ucstrategies.com\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/cropped-Nouveau-projet-11.jpg","width":500,"height":500,"caption":"UCStrategies Logo"},"description":"Expert news, reviews and analysis on AI tools, unified communications, and workplace technology.","foundingDate":"2020","ethicsPolicy":"https:\/\/ucstrategies.com\/news\/editorial-policy\/","correctionsPolicy":"https:\/\/ucstrategies.com\/news\/editorial-policy\/#corrections-policy","masthead":"https:\/\/ucstrategies.com\/news\/about-us\/","actionableFeedbackPolicy":"https:\/\/ucstrategies.com\/news\/editorial-policy\/","publishingPrinciples":"https:\/\/ucstrategies.com\/news\/editorial-policy\/","ownershipFundingInfo":"https:\/\/ucstrategies.com\/news\/about-us\/","noBylinesPolicy":"https:\/\/ucstrategies.com\/news\/editorial-policy\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ucstrategies.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4923","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ucstrategies.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ucstrategies.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ucstrategies.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ucstrategies.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4923"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/ucstrategies.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4923\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4936,"href":"https:\/\/ucstrategies.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4923\/revisions\/4936"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ucstrategies.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/4935"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ucstrategies.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4923"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ucstrategies.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4923"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ucstrategies.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4923"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}